This web page is included as a technical article, journal, technical, news, games and CV of Pankpond. Pankpond have 5 years experience of Information Technology and Software development worked for the multi-national company (Thai,French,Australia)

วันเสาร์ที่ 13 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2553

Pankpond - Good story about law

As one court in this world.
This case is a divorce case. I accept that the lady who wishes to divorce the husband in fact. Clients who have brought this issue to explain to the office I listen long. But I am not to prosecute. Because with the wish to return to reconcile the two children. Will have a father and mother complete. Because resistance to requests from clients are not. Divorce cases occur.

Because divorce cases. Most of the reform in the first meeting. If it can not be agreed to investigate. I ask talks atmosphere in court. And discussion of all people. (Plaintiff is a lady. Defendant is man).

Court: Plaintiff defendant enough to talk or not.

Complaint: Will not talk about what total. Like parting.

Court: This imitation of the plaintiff has requested not to indict the defendant. And for each share wealth.
Meantime, if you have not agreed. Try to ask details of the property and sometimes authority.

The child before the parents will share work?.

Court: the defendant is male. Try proposed before นะ. Moment to ask the court to any other.

Court: Government and two children. Who will be the parents.

Defendant: the plaintiff is the parent ครับ.

Court: This court record that. Plaintiff agreed to a child both parents.

Court: home and land. Defendants would share work?.

Defendant: home and land. When his wife was not. I do not know why it keeps. Stored will cause distress to Plaintiff.

Court: Ban on land and court records that the defendant will not be divided. Plaintiff to have sole ownership.

Court: the last piece of property and cars that work? Defendants.

Defendant: normal cars we used to share. If not, when were together then. Is no longer necessary. Complaint car.

Court: Court records that the defendant would drive to become the property of the plaintiff.

Court: This case can be agreed on the property. The divorce issue would not be a problem, but what the defendant as the court.

Save the defendant did not bring anything to the asset no. Then the following is how. Court wants to negotiate for what the property.
The plaintiff, a defendant's wife.

Defendant: I want to be the only.

Court: or what.

Defendant: My wife.

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

เกี่ยวกับฉัน